The most important lesson: personal finance is not really about money
If money is your hope for independence you will never have it. The only real security that a man will have in this world is a reserve of knowledge, experience, and ability — Henry Ford
In my opinion, personal finance is about financial independence. It is about having the proper knowledge, experiences, and ability to make better decisions. It is not about making decisions that give you the most money.
The money-first mentality is common, but it is wrong. There are always non-monetary considerations, and they are usually more important. What separates a good decision from a bad one is whether you weigh the costs and benefits appropriately. It’s about consciously choosing the best path.
Costly but right decision
Here is the story about career decision to illustrate. Recently my friend was deciding whether to switch jobs. His current job had great compensation, good networking opportunities, and a promising career path with salary jumps roughly every five years. It would be hard to find a better paying job. On the other hand, the job was so demanding my friend found little time to exercise or even sleep.
Ultimately, he took a 20 percent pay cut so he could spend time with family, sleep, and pursue interests like watching movies and traveling to Europe. It’s not the money that matters–it’s the satisfaction at the end of the day. My friend made the right choice only because he accounted for non-monetary factors.
Costly and wrong decision
That’s not to say all costly decisions are good. Some are just plain stupid. Consider a common situation: buying a high-end TV using credit card debt. The decision is not bad since a lot of money was spent. Heck, $2000 for a TV might be worth the great entertainment. A study in Science magazine explained that people were very happy when watching TV. The difference in this situation is that the monetary costs are simply too high.
Here are some facts. A $2000 TV could end up costing a phenomenal $7,000 in total credit card payments. Furthermore, those same credit card payments could have netted $46,000 if invested conservatively. Would any one consciously trade $53,000 (lost investments + credit card payments) for a $2,000 TV? No way! Yet people do this all the time. I suspect this is because such buyers are unaware of the true financial costs and they justify reckless behavior because others do the same. A bad decision–like jumping off of a cliff–is bad, even if a million people do it.
These examples illustrate that conscious spending is the key to personal finance.
This post is part 1 of a 7-part series on the most important lessons in personal finance. Here are links to all of the articles in the series:
- Personal finance is not about money
- Know your preferences
- Consider opportunity costs
- Calculate risk
- Know the time value of money
- Consider taxes
- Know the value of your time
Knowing these factors, and applying these principles are the real way to make good decisions and get rich.
A few good books
Incidentally, if you want to know more about these factors, there are a few books that I would highly suggest you take a look at:
–Die Broke An amazing book on personal finance–see my full review
–The Black Swan A modern classic about risk and financial markets–a must-read for educated investors and decision makers
–Spend ‘Til the End An introduction to “consumption smoothing,” the goal of getting the highest sustainable living standard
You may also want to check my updated list of recommended books for my current recommendations.
But enough of my recommendations. What other factors do you think are important to making good personal finance decisions?
Share this post:
Previous post: Welcome
Next post: Preferences, not money, dictate personal finance
Other posts you may enjoy reading:




7 Responses to “The most important lesson: personal finance is not really about money”
I dislike the 46k investment comparison immensely.
By Joon on Sep 6, 2007
@Joon: Can you explain why you dislike it? I agree it’s a hand-picked example, but it is not an unrealistic comparison.
By Presh on Sep 6, 2007
UGH! This example as well as the corresponding link “total credit card payments” have a gross misrepresentation.
On one case, it is comparing the pay down of 2% of the total balance, which starts at $40 and decreases every month. In the other case, it uses $40 a month every month. This is apples and oranges!
If we instead chose a $40/month payment every month on the credit card balance of $2000 at 18% interest, we have the card paid of in 7 years, 10 months.
In that same period of time, 40 dollars per month (time value excluded) is $3760 ($40/month * 94 months). This means $1760 in interest.
$40 invested every month at 8% for the same time period is $5280.
Therefore, to make a proper comparison, we need to be comparing $5280 to $3760 to properly assess opportunity cost.
The reality is it comes down to the interest rate, not the card. If the rate on the card is the same 8%, there is no opportunity cost to relative to the investment at 8%.
Therefore, the entire calculations in this example and in the link provided are misleading and GROSSLY overstate the downside of using a credit card (and no, I am certainly no advocate of credit card use, but I am an advocate for accuracy).
All the best.
By Marcello on Jan 7, 2009
Thanks for the correction Marcello…I see I blundered by not checking the math of the place I linked–I will certainly be more careful about that.
By Presh Talwalkar on Jan 8, 2009
You made some very valid reasons why money should not be thought of as the foremost factor that matters most in our lives. You are right since we usually think about all the benefits that money would give us as a consequence.
By George Alarcon on Nov 1, 2009