<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Non-Mathematical Guide to Fixed Point Theorems and Proving Nash Equilibria Exist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2007/11/20/game-theory-tuesdays-a-brain-teaser-and-related-trivia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2007/11/20/game-theory-tuesdays-a-brain-teaser-and-related-trivia/</link>
	<description>Articles on game theory and personal finance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The &#8216;magic&#8217; number 495 - Mind Your Decisions</title>
		<link>http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2007/11/20/game-theory-tuesdays-a-brain-teaser-and-related-trivia/comment-page-1/#comment-12011</link>
		<dc:creator>The &#8216;magic&#8217; number 495 - Mind Your Decisions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 05:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2007/11/20/game-theory-tuesdays-a-brain-teaser-and-related-trivia/#comment-12011</guid>
		<description>[...] Fixed points are a useful mathematical entity, and they have a special place in game theory. The way John Nash proved that many games have equilibria is by using a fixed point theorem: he showed that under certain conditions, there must exist a set of strategies such that no player can deviate profitably. The set of strategies is a fixed point that survives the strategic thinking of every player responding to the other players. (more on that here) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fixed points are a useful mathematical entity, and they have a special place in game theory. The way John Nash proved that many games have equilibria is by using a fixed point theorem: he showed that under certain conditions, there must exist a set of strategies such that no player can deviate profitably. The set of strategies is a fixed point that survives the strategic thinking of every player responding to the other players. (more on that here) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dice Brain Teaser: A Technical Interview Question that Can Help You Solve Problems Better - Mind Your Decisions</title>
		<link>http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2007/11/20/game-theory-tuesdays-a-brain-teaser-and-related-trivia/comment-page-1/#comment-8991</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dice Brain Teaser: A Technical Interview Question that Can Help You Solve Problems Better - Mind Your Decisions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 04:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2007/11/20/game-theory-tuesdays-a-brain-teaser-and-related-trivia/#comment-8991</guid>
		<description>[...] puzzle is special. I like it even more than previous brain teasers I&#8217;ve discussed, like the monk problem and the hat [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] puzzle is special. I like it even more than previous brain teasers I&#8217;ve discussed, like the monk problem and the hat [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Game Theory scene from A Beautiful Mind - Mind Your Decisions</title>
		<link>http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2007/11/20/game-theory-tuesdays-a-brain-teaser-and-related-trivia/comment-page-1/#comment-8975</link>
		<dc:creator>Game Theory scene from A Beautiful Mind - Mind Your Decisions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 04:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2007/11/20/game-theory-tuesdays-a-brain-teaser-and-related-trivia/#comment-8975</guid>
		<description>[...] A Nash equilibrium is a state where no one person can improve, given what others are doing. This means you are picking the best possible action in response to others&#8211;the formal term is you are picking a best response. (For more, see my article on why Nash equilibrium exist). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Nash equilibrium is a state where no one person can improve, given what others are doing. This means you are picking the best possible action in response to others&#8211;the formal term is you are picking a best response. (For more, see my article on why Nash equilibrium exist). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ultimatum Game and The Hollywood Writer&#8217;s Strike - Mind Your Decisions</title>
		<link>http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2007/11/20/game-theory-tuesdays-a-brain-teaser-and-related-trivia/comment-page-1/#comment-8964</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ultimatum Game and The Hollywood Writer&#8217;s Strike - Mind Your Decisions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 03:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2007/11/20/game-theory-tuesdays-a-brain-teaser-and-related-trivia/#comment-8964</guid>
		<description>[...] A Nash equilibrium is based on your beliefs about other players, and how accurate those beliefs are. I gave some intuition about the Nash equilibrium in this post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Nash equilibrium is based on your beliefs about other players, and how accurate those beliefs are. I gave some intuition about the Nash equilibrium in this post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Presh Talwalkar</title>
		<link>http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2007/11/20/game-theory-tuesdays-a-brain-teaser-and-related-trivia/comment-page-1/#comment-7917</link>
		<dc:creator>Presh Talwalkar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 01:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2007/11/20/game-theory-tuesdays-a-brain-teaser-and-related-trivia/#comment-7917</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment. Yeah, perhaps the soda can example is a bad one. Imagine instead you were rolling the soda can on the ground so it would explode. I think that would be continuous and Brouwer&#039;s theorem would apply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment. Yeah, perhaps the soda can example is a bad one. Imagine instead you were rolling the soda can on the ground so it would explode. I think that would be continuous and Brouwer&#8217;s theorem would apply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

