<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Risk is Not the Science of Calculated Odds; It is an Art of Skepticism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2008/04/03/risk-is-not-the-science-of-calculated-odds-it-is-an-art-of-skepticism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2008/04/03/risk-is-not-the-science-of-calculated-odds-it-is-an-art-of-skepticism/</link>
	<description>Articles on game theory and personal finance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Presh Talwalkar</title>
		<link>http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2008/04/03/risk-is-not-the-science-of-calculated-odds-it-is-an-art-of-skepticism/comment-page-1/#comment-1384</link>
		<dc:creator>Presh Talwalkar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 03:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2008/04/03/risk-is-not-the-science-of-calculated-odds-it-is-an-art-of-skepticism/#comment-1384</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;&lt;em&gt;Michael Webster&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/em&gt;: Your observation about Taleb great...it made me laugh.

I appreciate the book rec&#039;s to give another perspective--you are very well read :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><em>Michael Webster</em></b>: Your observation about Taleb great&#8230;it made me laugh.</p>
<p>I appreciate the book rec&#8217;s to give another perspective&#8211;you are very well read <img src='http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael webster</title>
		<link>http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2008/04/03/risk-is-not-the-science-of-calculated-odds-it-is-an-art-of-skepticism/comment-page-1/#comment-1382</link>
		<dc:creator>michael webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 02:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2008/04/03/risk-is-not-the-science-of-calculated-odds-it-is-an-art-of-skepticism/#comment-1382</guid>
		<description>Taleb is an interesting writer, but prone to overblown statements.

Model risk is well known, especially by poker players.

Taleb is complaining about a particular model of financial risk in which risk is reduced to volatility.

To better understand the tremendous strides we have taken in understanding and modeling risk, I would recommend both Berstein&#039;s book on Risk and Hackings&#039; book on the Emergence of Probability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taleb is an interesting writer, but prone to overblown statements.</p>
<p>Model risk is well known, especially by poker players.</p>
<p>Taleb is complaining about a particular model of financial risk in which risk is reduced to volatility.</p>
<p>To better understand the tremendous strides we have taken in understanding and modeling risk, I would recommend both Berstein&#8217;s book on Risk and Hackings&#8217; book on the Emergence of Probability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Presh Talwalkar</title>
		<link>http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2008/04/03/risk-is-not-the-science-of-calculated-odds-it-is-an-art-of-skepticism/comment-page-1/#comment-1256</link>
		<dc:creator>Presh Talwalkar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 06:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2008/04/03/risk-is-not-the-science-of-calculated-odds-it-is-an-art-of-skepticism/#comment-1256</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mahesh&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/em&gt;: Excellently stated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><em>Mahesh</em></b>: Excellently stated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahesh</title>
		<link>http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2008/04/03/risk-is-not-the-science-of-calculated-odds-it-is-an-art-of-skepticism/comment-page-1/#comment-1248</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 14:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2008/04/03/risk-is-not-the-science-of-calculated-odds-it-is-an-art-of-skepticism/#comment-1248</guid>
		<description>Modeling risk and recognizing risk are two different things. Decisons and their scope should be made on both the modeling aspect and the recognition of risk. You can&#039;t let the modeling of risk issues interfere with your decision making process.  Sometimes decisions can&#039;t wait or the worse risk may be in not taking any decision at all. A good risk model should be able to quantify the recognition of a risk to a certain extent but you should not become a slave to it and let it drive your decision. We tend to like our own risk models and we forget that it is to quantify it to a certain degree of probability but not to a complete certainity.
Nice summary by Roho Mech!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modeling risk and recognizing risk are two different things. Decisons and their scope should be made on both the modeling aspect and the recognition of risk. You can&#8217;t let the modeling of risk issues interfere with your decision making process.  Sometimes decisions can&#8217;t wait or the worse risk may be in not taking any decision at all. A good risk model should be able to quantify the recognition of a risk to a certain extent but you should not become a slave to it and let it drive your decision. We tend to like our own risk models and we forget that it is to quantify it to a certain degree of probability but not to a complete certainity.<br />
Nice summary by Roho Mech!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Presh Talwalkar</title>
		<link>http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2008/04/03/risk-is-not-the-science-of-calculated-odds-it-is-an-art-of-skepticism/comment-page-1/#comment-1245</link>
		<dc:creator>Presh Talwalkar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 02:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2008/04/03/risk-is-not-the-science-of-calculated-odds-it-is-an-art-of-skepticism/#comment-1245</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;&lt;em&gt;Michael Cardus&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/em&gt;: That&#039;s a very interesting story. Pricing risk is a tough job and often depends on who ends up paying.

&lt;b&gt;&lt;em&gt;RohoMech&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/em&gt;: Yes, one should carry skepticism to model predictions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><em>Michael Cardus</em></b>: That&#8217;s a very interesting story. Pricing risk is a tough job and often depends on who ends up paying.</p>
<p><b><em>RohoMech</em></b>: Yes, one should carry skepticism to model predictions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

