How much money do you need to be happy?

source: Joe Shlabotnik via flickr

At Stanford, I heard someone say they needed to make at least $150,000 annually to be happy. I was surprised for many reasons, but most of all, I was surprised at how serious the person took the question. I was raised with values like “health is wealth” and “money can’t buy you happiness.” Was I wrong all this time?

I have been interested in the link between money and happiness ever since. And so far, most of my experiences have confirmed my upbringing de-emphasizing money. While I see how too little money causes unhappiness, there is scant evidence of the inverse. Time and again I see that after a modest income level money and happiness aren’t that related.

Some of the happiest people I have met are associate professors on modest salaries who have good families and love their work. And among the unhappiest people I have met are the filthy rich. They have stresses and problems I never knew existed (I can’t believe the battery on my new Lexus died because I left it in the garage for too long…arg!).

I guess none of this is too surprising. It’s well understood most goods eventually lose their appeal when consumed in larger and larger amounts. The fifth slice of pizza you scarf down at a buffet never tastes as good as the first. Naturally money should exhibit such diminishing returns. But the interesting question is: when does this happen?

I would have guessed a fairly large amount, like $200,000. And I would have been wrong.

I came across an interesting study in the book The Mind of the Market by Michael Shermer, professor of economics at Claremont Graduate University. Shermer summarizes research that suggests that money has little effect on happiness at a level much, much lower than most of us would guess (like $20,000):

Arguably the most penetrating and most international study of happiness ever conducted is that of the World Values Survey that includes 250 questions that yield four hundred to eight hundred measurable variables. Over the past thirty years the survey shows that while people in certain pockets of the globe experience temporary increases or decreases in happiness, the average level of happiness has remained essentially unchanged. Once average income is above $20,000 per annum in today’s dollars-enough to put a roof over your head and provide three square meals a day for you and your family-more money does not bring more happiness.

[The Mind of the Market, p. 145-6]

There are several theories competing to explain these results. The two Shermer explores are:

  1. Happiness is related to genetics (some people are born to be happy regardless of income level), and
  2. Happiness is relative not absolute (living at the same income level as others may make you happier than being rich and constantly staring up at the super-rich).

While none of these reasons should diminish your desire or non-desire to accumulate wealth, they do suggest that money isn’t always the problem.

In a down market like this, it’s good to be reminded that one can be happy on less. Money isn’t everything. Try some new foods or relax if you need a change of pace. And if you really feel like you need to feel like a million dollars to be happy, maybe you could consider my “secret.”

What are your thoughts?



Share this post:

| More

Previous post:

Next post:



  • Glen Pearson

    It appears to me as if desire for wealth and happiness with your lot are gaseous in nature – they expand to fill the financial space available. If you are content with what you have, you would also be content with twice that amount. If you are not content with what you have, you would not be content with any amount.

    Is there a corresponding change in pressure with financial “volume” changes? This research appears to say their isn’t. Although, I don’t think happiness is a very good, or at least only partial, measure for life pressure (stress).

    Like many in this recession, I am having to learn if I will be as content with less. I imagine that after a period of adjustment, I will. You picked a very timely topic.

  • P

    There is happiness in being able to live below your means. There is also happiness in being in a job that that you like. So associate professors might be relatively happy, while a $15/hr call center drone who is heavily micromanaged, has supervisors policing their web surfing, emails and phone calls, forced to work night shift, and has their schedule cut at random times, not as much.

  • http://billmill.org Bill Mill

    I’d love to see if happiness correlated with the derivative of your income. I wonder if the already-published studies looked at income *history*?

  • http://www.fieryscribe.com The Fiery Scribe

    Justin Wolfers and Betsy Stevenson had a paper out last year, “Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox”, which seems to argue that more income does make a difference, even beyond the 15K/20K threshold.

    The NYT had a nice summary of it: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/16/business/16leonhardt.html?_r=1&em&ex=1208491200&en=595ddbd5a47192bf&ei=5087

  • http://www.mindyourdecisions.com/blog/ Presh Talwalkar

    Thanks all for the comments. There are a lot of issues to discuss on this topic…of course on this site I don’t judge what works for anyone else as I ask everyone mind their own decisions. So ultimately this research may help guide us but it is by no means sacrosanct.

    The Fiery Scribe: Thanks! I had read that article a long time ago but it slipped my mind. This is fascinating research and I am going to read more about why money might buy happiness.

  • http://duartes.org/gustavo/blog Gustavo Duarte

    Presh,

    This Freakonomics post is relevant:

    http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/22/the-economics-of-happiness-part-4-are-rich-people-happier-than-poor-people/

    Seems to contradict some of the results you posted here.

    cheers

  • http://www.mindyourdecisions.com/blog/ Presh Talwalkar

    Wolfer’s work seems very interesting–I’ll have to read up on it. Thanks for passing that along!

  • Narendra Kale

    Presh:
    Great post. I always admire your precise language and crisp thoughts with great maturity. I am sure you would go places.
    Good luck.

  • Hugh Boland

    Interesting theory but I’m not sure I’m convinced. The Buddists say ‘Life is Suffering, Suffering is Desire’. It is our nature to want, even though it can make us unhappy, and our evolution to date has depended on that. It bought us down from the trees, out of the caves and everything we have discovered/created since right up to the PC I am using now.
    Also while some are fortunate enough to have found fulfilling jobs, most people making just ‘adaquate’ money, do so in pretty miserable situations. While most feel they are not paid enough, that is just one of the things that they do not like about their job, and while most can think of something they would find more fulfilling, they suspect it would not pay ‘enough’.
    I once read that it has more to do with where you live and your peer group. Being, or thinking, that you are relatively better off than the people around you makes you happier.
    Personally, having lost my job to the recession and some guy in India, I am back in college. Never been more broke in my life a





Previous post:

Next post:

Other posts you may enjoy reading: