Why cooking at home is smart
During this time off from the blog, I have had much time to reflect on some of my favorite articles. Here is one from the July 2008 email newsletter that I found relevant–hope it finds you well! (sign up for the free Mind Your Decisions email newsletter at phplist)
image by erix via flickr
Food companies and restaurants hold tremendous power. They have warped our notions about portion size and even influenced our health guidelines. They have even gotten to financial advisers, convincing them that buying prepared meals is “smarter” when you consider the cost of time. I find this absurd–I think such statements are primarily made to defend unhealthy habits.
I primarily eat home-cooked meals and only dine out once or twice a week for a change. This means I will bring home-cooked food into the office when necessary. Often people compare their own highly-processed and greasy meals to mine and admit envy. But not always. Once, my mentor told me I was wrong. He told me it’s better to dine out because my time as a worker was “worth more money.”
I agreed with him that the time value of money is important, but I ultimately disagreed with his logic for three reasons.
First, it’s virtually impossible to value personal time uniformly in monetary terms. Some hours are worth a lot–like hours sleeping–while others can be improved–like watching excessive television. I solve the problem by only comparing money to money and time to time. An hour gets its worth relative to other hours. If I only have 2 hours of free time, then each hour gets 50 percent weight and is very important. I don’t usually consider the money value of personal time. After all, I can’t substitute cooking time with extra hours at the office given that I work on a salary.
Second, most people who dine out instead of cook don’t realize how much time it really takes to get food. My mentor didn’t want to spend 30 minutes preparing his meal, but he was willing to spend 15 minutes going to a restaurant and 15 minutes waiting for the food to be served. Mental accounting is not always as precise as it should be.
Third, and finally, it is harder to find high quality and healthy food when dining out. Most consumers base decisions on sticker cost. Additionally, higher quality products only make sense when consumers appreciate the value. Consequently, many restaurants tend to stock the lowest acceptable quality for the general public–reasonable economics, but somewhat disconcerting for my tastes. There are notable exceptions, and I’m sure you have found a few healthy places to dine out. The reality nowadays is that good, healthy restaurants are the exception and not the rule.
Cooking at home is too good to pass up. You save money and you can save your health, if you plan appropriately. You’ll be using your time for something that really matters.
Share this post:
Previous post: Mind Your Decisions and Game Theory Tuesdays on Break (again)
Next post: The Russian roulette puzzle
Other posts you may enjoy reading:





5 Responses to “Why cooking at home is smart”
Completely agree with you. Besides, cooking is an art and could be fun to experiment sometimes… also waiting for food at the restaurant somehow makes me restless, but helping my mother in the kitchen doesn’t.
By Abhishek on Jul 27, 2009
Well said. You could also say that in the time you’re taking to cook, you’ve developing skills and a better understanding of food. Skills you would not have otherwise acquired by ordering from a menu and paying for it.
By Charlene on Jul 27, 2009
most restaurants have lousy food. It’s heavily processed, with an abundance of salt, sugar, fats, often lard or hydrogenated fats. One big problem is that unprocessed ingredients, including fresh fruits and veggies are very labor intensive and spoil quickly. Labor doesn’t scale, and so its something to be minimized in order to maximize profits.
By guy on Jul 27, 2009
I think in the US it is cheaper to buy restaurant food with reasonable quality than in Europe. In the US supermarkets are often open 24×7 and therefore they are much more expensive than in Europe. I wonder why Americans apparently go to the supermarket in the middle of the night when they have so many restaurants.
Cooking with unprocessed food is of course much healthier than buying processed food from restaurants or supermarkets. If you eat healthy hygienically cooked food you probably save a lot of time and costs in the long run.
When I was in the US it seemed that eating in restaurants definitely had a short term advantage, at least if you go to a restaurant nearby without any waiting time.
By numericalexample.com on Jul 28, 2009
Abhishek, Charlene, and guy: I also wonder why people wait 1 hour to eat at a breakfast restaurant when such foods take no more than 30 minutes to prepare, eat, and clean! One of the worst examples is people going out to eat pancakes, which is an easy mixture of flour, liquids and fat. And yet, people are willing to dress up, drive, wait, and pay 10 times more for the luxury of someone else making pancakes for them. I once saw pancake batter in a tube in a supermarket. I think this is a clear sign of the end of western civilization…
numericalexample: Interesting perspective. I always considered U.S. to be relatively expensive on prepared foods. My comparison was India.
By Presh Talwalkar on Aug 29, 2009