<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pascal&#8217;s Wager inverted: all atheists go to heaven?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2009/08/11/how-pascals-wager-also-implies-atheism-is-a-winning-bet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2009/08/11/how-pascals-wager-also-implies-atheism-is-a-winning-bet/</link>
	<description>Articles on game theory and personal finance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Gottschalk</title>
		<link>http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2009/08/11/how-pascals-wager-also-implies-atheism-is-a-winning-bet/comment-page-1/#comment-9214</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Gottschalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 00:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/?p=1600#comment-9214</guid>
		<description>another problem is that faith is not a practical issue. it&#039;s not like buying insurance. or at least it shouldn&#039;t be. in my opinion, true faith cannot be contrived.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another problem is that faith is not a practical issue. it&#8217;s not like buying insurance. or at least it shouldn&#8217;t be. in my opinion, true faith cannot be contrived.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Need help on this probablity question dealing with God! &#124; MathFax.com</title>
		<link>http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2009/08/11/how-pascals-wager-also-implies-atheism-is-a-winning-bet/comment-page-1/#comment-7140</link>
		<dc:creator>Need help on this probablity question dealing with God! &#124; MathFax.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 04:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/?p=1600#comment-7140</guid>
		<description>[...] Answer 1 : Bear in mind the argument given in this article. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Answer 1 : Bear in mind the argument given in this article. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derek</title>
		<link>http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2009/08/11/how-pascals-wager-also-implies-atheism-is-a-winning-bet/comment-page-1/#comment-6187</link>
		<dc:creator>derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/?p=1600#comment-6187</guid>
		<description>pascals wager is fine, but you could apply it to all gods, ra, thor, allah, odin, the list goes on, so which god should you believe in</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pascals wager is fine, but you could apply it to all gods, ra, thor, allah, odin, the list goes on, so which god should you believe in</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlo Paggi</title>
		<link>http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2009/08/11/how-pascals-wager-also-implies-atheism-is-a-winning-bet/comment-page-1/#comment-5777</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlo Paggi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/?p=1600#comment-5777</guid>
		<description>Hello,

why use the name Pascal when, as Jon pointed out,
it is *not* Pascal&#039;s wager we are talking about.

Let&#039;s call it - say - Mr. Banana wager, just to clarify matter.

Cheers,
C</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>why use the name Pascal when, as Jon pointed out,<br />
it is *not* Pascal&#8217;s wager we are talking about.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s call it &#8211; say &#8211; Mr. Banana wager, just to clarify matter.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2009/08/11/how-pascals-wager-also-implies-atheism-is-a-winning-bet/comment-page-1/#comment-5741</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/?p=1600#comment-5741</guid>
		<description>It is very interesting indeed. I would go a bit further though, because there are more flaws in Pascal&#039;s game theoretic model (of course, it is a bit pretentious to give this label to this theory). Another critique would be that it does not take into account the fact that the preference rankings of different individuals may skew his results. Moreover, the payoffs can only be finite due to the law of diminishing returns. There certainly is a point where the cost function meets the benefit function in this situation, thus rendering Pascal&#039;s theory rather artificial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is very interesting indeed. I would go a bit further though, because there are more flaws in Pascal&#8217;s game theoretic model (of course, it is a bit pretentious to give this label to this theory). Another critique would be that it does not take into account the fact that the preference rankings of different individuals may skew his results. Moreover, the payoffs can only be finite due to the law of diminishing returns. There certainly is a point where the cost function meets the benefit function in this situation, thus rendering Pascal&#8217;s theory rather artificial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

