Why I would rather watch the end of a close soccer match than a close basketball game

Close soccer matches are usually interesting. Teams are pressing on offense or locking down on defense. There’s a lot of chaos and intense energy.

This is less so in close basketball games. Usually teams are deliberate on offense and defense, stalling with fouls and timeouts. The pace is maddeningly sluggish. In one notable college basketball game, the final 3:19 took a whopping 23 minutes. How anti-climactic.

Why are the endings to these two sports so different? It’s partly due to the game-ending timing rule.

SportsHistory.us by Daniel Lauve has a fantastic explanation in the article Suspense vs. Purity: A Game Theory Perspective on Timed Sports.

Daniel starts out by discussing how players respond to fixed timed endings. The analogy used is the repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma in which the dominant strategy is to defect in any finite iteration. It was seen that some integrity could be restored if the exact ending round was unknown or probabilistically determined, thanks to experimental work by Professor Robert Axelrod.

The game theory experiment suggests a solution for the poor ending of basketball games:

Timed sporting events can have their consistency restored if we play them under uncertainty, keeping the participants in the dark about when the game will end. Some sports already do this, with varied results. In most soccer matches, stoppage time is added to the end of the match in an amount known only to the referees. In boxing, the scores are kept from the participants, which means that a boxer may be less likely to go for a knockout late in the match because he does not know whether the scoring dictates such a strategy.

I would be excited if basketball or NFL football might experiment with new game-ending rules. Daniel is less enthused and ultimately says this is a theoretical solution that fans, players, and coaches may not enjoy: “We would all miss the sports moments created by a ticking clock.”

There is also some talk about limiting timeouts to improve basketball. For now, the game will be riddled with slow endings, fixed timings, and the occasional exciting buzzer-beater.



Share this post:

| More

Previous post:

Next post:



  • Benvitale

    Hi,
    I came across this article: Game Theory in Soccer

    http://truckandbarter.com/mt/archives/2006/06/game_theory_in_1.html

  • http://www.franchise-info.ca michael webster

    Presh, this doesn’t sound right to me. Hockey games in the last 2-3 minutes can be fantastic, even with a 2 goal difference. There is only 1 time-out, 30 seconds, but the opposition can get a man advantage by pulling their goal tender.

    Everyone watches the clock – even with .5 seconds left someone could score the winning goal off a face off.

Previous post:

Next post: